![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 4,374
Casino cash: $8572 ![]() |
![]()
My CSL has Aircon, Xenons and Radio. When standard on Simpson's scales with 1/4 tank it's 1422kg's. It's now 1394kg's.
My old M3 with a decent spec. On Simpson's scales with the same fuel load was 1595kg's. I'd say that's significant. It's also a significantly different experience to drive but I understand where your coming from. Is an RS worth £20k more or that much better than a GT3? Pointless arguement really. It just is that way. Same with a CSL.
__________________
CSL Register Alcoholics Anonymous Group Leader & Businessman of the Year '93! www.earleyengineering.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shaboogling
Posts: 7,199
Casino cash: $28478 ![]() |
![]()
I thought I was on the steam cleaner thread for a few moments
![]()
__________________
CSL Register Lifestyle Coach and Social Secretary |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Driving it like I nicked it
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,099
Casino cash: $13060 ![]() |
![]()
Given the only real weight adding options were radio, xenons and ac there is little chance of speccing one up to near a normal m3.
Mine with 2/3 tank with ac and radio was 1420kg, still heavy but not m3 heavy. I maintain the quicker car on the road from a to b will be the one with the least cautious driver...
__________________
Nathan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 801
Casino cash: $8979 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Very good, I like. lol T$
__________________
Club Tankslapper: No doughnuts or wingnuts, if but’s, and monkey nuts. It's not a proper accident until you eat hospital food |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 4,374
Casino cash: $8572 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
CSL Register Alcoholics Anonymous Group Leader & Businessman of the Year '93! www.earleyengineering.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Driving it like I nicked it
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,787
Casino cash: $29982 ![]() |
![]()
I measured the weight of my CSL this friday.
full tank -> 1420kg options are AP racing brakes front/rear and SS race lightweight (AC, radiocd, xenon and rainsensor). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
S4 - Getting the hang of it
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 202
Casino cash: $707 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
S5 - Full Throttle
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 268
Casino cash: $1363 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Alex - what did you do to go from 1422 to 1394 out of interest ? I read somewhere that M3 seats weight 30Kg each. So depending on your mounts there's a fair bit to be saved there. Nathan - spot on - as always, its the driver that makes the difference... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
CSL Register Uber-poster!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 4,374
Casino cash: $8572 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Supersprint centre section and lightweight rear box. -20kgs AP's all round -4kgs??? Intrax - -????? Some stuff out of the boot floor. Result 1394kg's. ![]()
__________________
CSL Register Alcoholics Anonymous Group Leader & Businessman of the Year '93! www.earleyengineering.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sussex
Posts: 613
Casino cash: $5830 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
When you refer to someone being the 'least cautious driver', I'm guessing that your referring to the fact that you would drive a normal M3 worth 10-15k faster than you would your 25-30k CSL? Well if you spare a thought for those that might not be able to afford a CSL just yet, you'll soon realise that what is 30k to you, might be 10k to others, and in fact most of these cars are indeed our 'pride and joy' and are all driven with the same degree of caution. It would be wonderful to drive a normal M3 like a loon and think 'oh well it's only 10k if I put it in the ditch'. But sadly that's not the case here. ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|