What a Body

**Mark CSL** · 21-11-2010, 08:29 PM

Bounce · 21-11-2010, 08:36 PM

**RolyGTIR** · 21-11-2010, 11:03 PM

Thats what you call a Kronenbourg!

cslgirl · 21-11-2010, 11:15 PM

**shimmy** · 21-11-2010, 11:28 PM

this is interesting as i have been chatting to the wifey the past few weeks about certain things

she had bought some combat trousers, that were fitted and looked very young. Now she wears them well and certainly did not look ropey in them BUT i did happen to say that i reckoned women need to look no more than 15 years older from the front than from the back. Now as you can imagine hi had to say it twice then axplain what i meant by which point i wish i had not bothered.

What do you guys and gals think. My take on it is that when you walk or drive by a lady, from the back her clothes, hair and general figure and stance should at least give you an idea of the age range they are in. Otherwise if you get round the front and they are 20 years older the shock can be severe and probably make them less attractive than if they just were a bit frumpy and middle aged

Discuss!

cslgirl · 22-11-2010, 09:01 AM

I know where you are coming from Shim, but that is probably not the best thing to say to your wife.

If she wears them well and looks good in them (and you think so too), why should she care what some perv thinks as he comes past to have a stare

I think (normal) women know what they can and cannot get away with at their respective ages.

On the other side of it, you could have a slim blonde girl wearing not a lot swishing down the pavement, take look at her from the front and think fecking hell, look at the boat race on that! That's a Jeremy Kyle candidate if I ever saw one.

**cantfind1** · 22-11-2010, 09:33 AM

I think I fancy Shimmy's wife!

**Manny_RDS** · 23-11-2010, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy

this is interesting as i have been chatting to the wifey the past few weeks about certain things

she had bought some combat trousers, that were fitted and looked very young. Now she wears them well and certainly did not look ropey in them BUT i did happen to say that i reckoned women need to look no more than 15 years older from the front than from the back. Now as you can imagine hi had to say it twice then axplain what i meant by which point i wish i had not bothered.

What do you guys and gals think. My take on it is that when you walk or drive by a lady, from the back her clothes, hair and general figure and stance should at least give you an idea of the age range they are in. Otherwise if you get round the front and they are 20 years older the shock can be severe and probably make them less attractive than if they just were a bit frumpy and middle aged

Discuss!

I can cope with that, but the other day in the West End I was walking behind a girl, great figure, lovelly arse, tight jeans, high heels, she had the same haircut as the fit one from the the Saturdays. Then she turned around.

It was a fucking bloke

**shimmy** · 23-11-2010, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny_RDS

It was a fucking bloke

good shag?

Bounce · 23-11-2010, 04:49 PM

We have one like that down here,her nick name is 1664,16 from the back and 64 from the front.

21-11-2010, 08:29 PM	#1
Mark CSL CSL Register Uber-poster! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Scotland Posts: 8,777 Casino cash: $42229	What a Body

21-11-2010, 11:28 PM	#5
shimmy CSL Register Uber-poster! Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Uk Posts: 14,645 Casino cash: $43908	this is interesting as i have been chatting to the wifey the past few weeks about certain things she had bought some combat trousers, that were fitted and looked very young. Now she wears them well and certainly did not look ropey in them BUT i did happen to say that i reckoned women need to look no more than 15 years older from the front than from the back. Now as you can imagine hi had to say it twice then axplain what i meant by which point i wish i had not bothered. What do you guys and gals think. My take on it is that when you walk or drive by a lady, from the back her clothes, hair and general figure and stance should at least give you an idea of the age range they are in. Otherwise if you get round the front and they are 20 years older the shock can be severe and probably make them less attractive than if they just were a bit frumpy and middle aged Discuss! __________________ .

21-11-2010, 08:36 PM	#2
Bounce CSL Register Uber-poster! Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Cornwall Posts: 7,057 Casino cash: $35793

21-11-2010, 11:03 PM	#3
RolyGTIR S5 - Full Throttle Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Surrey Posts: 490 Casino cash: $6500	Thats what you call a Kronenbourg!

21-11-2010, 11:15 PM	#4
cslgirl S5, Sport On, DSC M-track Simon Champion! Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 1,498 Casino cash: $33392

22-11-2010, 09:01 AM	#6
cslgirl S5, Sport On, DSC M-track Simon Champion! Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 1,498 Casino cash: $33392	I know where you are coming from Shim, but that is probably not the best thing to say to your wife. If she wears them well and looks good in them (and you think so too), why should she care what some perv thinks as he comes past to have a stare I think (normal) women know what they can and cannot get away with at their respective ages. On the other side of it, you could have a slim blonde girl wearing not a lot swishing down the pavement, take look at her from the front and think fecking hell, look at the boat race on that! That's a Jeremy Kyle candidate if I ever saw one.

22-11-2010, 09:33 AM	#7
cantfind1 S5, Sport Off, DSC M-track Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Sydney Australia Posts: 675 Casino cash: $6490	I think I fancy Shimmy's wife!

23-11-2010, 04:49 PM	#10
Bounce CSL Register Uber-poster! Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Cornwall Posts: 7,057 Casino cash: $35793	We have one like that down here,her nick name is 1664,16 from the back and 64 from the front.