Obioban |
09-06-2013 02:23 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexk
(Post 147258)
Shame BMW you didn't sell the CSL in the US.
We are missing the opportunity to see CSLs with 20 x 12J square setups and -5 deg camber :wanker:
:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:
|
Weird, I could swear my car was on lightweight, forged 18s :wanker:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZ_M3
(Post 147310)
7. Some parts that are interchangeable will be re-classed as 'standardisation' - this is what we are seeing with the rear glass. Even bespoke parts on limited production vehicles can end up being standardised. Most of the time the standardised parts will be the 'top spec' part only - I am lead to believe that all the rear glass produced from now on might be the CSL item (a bit like the headers from 2005 onwards were all CSL items).
|
That would be nice for me... but I can't see it being true in this case. The CSL rear window isn't "better" so much as a different priority set. As in, it trades off increased cabin noise for weight. That is a trade off that I want to make (clearly from this thread), but I suspect it is not one that average BMW owner want to make. I (sadly) suspect the standardized version will be the non CSL version in this case. :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by digi
(Post 147334)
good to see that M3 enthusiasts are so passionate about these limited run M3's. Without them, the cult status being built right now would be alot weaker.
Keep it rolling guys, remove the elitist egos, makes the world a nicer place.
:thumbs::smokin:
Definately do not want a xenophobic atmosphere here especially with our brothers with M3's.
|
I was pretty surprised with the response I got.
|