funtime |
25-01-2011 09:38 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by titan
(Post 78949)
I've had two M3s and now a CSL.
Being honest - "real world" difference in terms of A to B on the roads? Nothing really assuming both M3 and CSL have same tyres. On the roads you don't (shouldn't?) be reaching the limits of brakes. The "real world experience" is different though, CSL just sounds more raw which adds to the illusion of speed.
Track? Well, both cars need modifying to make them sustainable on track. I'd argue that if you stripped both cars, same tyres/suspension/brakes then again, going to be fook all in it.
The deciding factor is just working out what you want it for, how much cash you have etc. The CSL is a rare beast on the roads whereas E46 are still very common. If you like the idea of taking good care of a car and having something different, CSL is ace. Although bear in mind that if used as a daily driver you're going to be far more narked if someone dings it in a carpark etc. You also can't get away from the impressive price hike a CSL demands over its equivalent mileage/condition M3.
You mentioned the girlfriend - remember that CSL seats don't adjust and the suspension can seem hard compared to modern armchairs so this may not win any favours.
If you were going to completely strip (ie devalue, or "ruin" to some) a car, do it with an M3. If you want a fast road car that looks the business and is also capable on track, CSL with brakes/suspension will be hard to beat.
Although - I did the Andy Walsh carlimits day yesterday with my brother. On Andy's "circuit" he punted the CSL round in 52 seconds, and my brothers crappy little 1.8 mx5 in 54 seconds. His circuit is essentially doing short blasts between cones and back again, so isn't representative of a track, but is probably similar to blasting between the roundabouts at milton keynes. Makes you think....
Anyhow, sounds like you want a decent ride for the road, either will do that nicely.
|
That has to be the most contradictory view so far, interesting that you think they'd be nothing in it if the same mods were applied to both cars, however I think that the crucial point is 'stripping'. I don't want to 'strip' my car and only then would you minimise the difference between the two as the weight would be a lot closer. Without stripping the M3 I wouldn't get anywhere near the weight of a CSL, which is essentially the key to track performance.... is this me back tracking and starting to go for the CSL?!?
As for the circuit you mention, a 52 second lap would make for a reasonably small track like you say, which is not what the CSL and neither the M3 is suited to. I'd imagine something like a Clio cup would have been as quick if not quicker than a CSL on a tight track - I certainly struggled with a few fettled ones on the weekend at Silverstone in the wet!
Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmy
(Post 78959)
Tyres maybe 1/3
Weight 1/3
Suspension 1/3
|
I would agree with you in pointing out it's unlikely to just be down to the tyres, however I'd say it's much more to do with the weight than the suspension surely? (assuming the CSL suspension is standard)
Quote:
Originally Posted by titan
(Post 78950)
Tyres. Pretty sure they test the cars as you'd expect to buy them from the dealer and I'm almost 100% they ran the CSL round the 'ring on cups.
32 seconds is less than half a second per corner given there are so many of the damn things :-)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuncanR
(Post 78965)
You can drive mine if you are around this area funtime ... me and your GF can wait and eat shit sandwiches until you come back ..... best make quite a few of them sandwiches !!:thumbs:
|
Duncan, if your serious about that then I wouldn't mind taking you up on the offer, providing there's nobody much closer to me. When I mention the girlfriend and her take on the situation - it was only in relation to a 'stripped out' M3 track car with no carpets etc... she would have no problem with the CSL whatsoever! :thumbs:
|